You know, I’ve been thinking, and thinking, and trying to understand some things about the Lord’s Supper, Communion, or Eucharist, depending on what tradition you’re from and what you prefer to call it. My quandry began when my son started asking to take communion at age 6, and he desperately wanted to know why he could not take the juice and cracker served each week at the end of the service at the church we then attended. That’s a hard one to explain, when he is such a questioner and thinker himself, and he exhibits a clear understanding of the Cross and what Jesus did to save him from his sins.
And so, firmly believing that an acceptance at the Lord’s Table would deeply encourage his troubled heart, we pursued permission to do so. It was a bit of an act of congress, but the leadership session decided it would be okay, after Jonathan talked to an elder about his faith and took vows of membership in front of the church. Now, please know, that this is the usual way of anyone being admitted to the Lord’s Table at our church, so nothing different was demanded of him than of anyone else. But this young one is troubled by doubts in the form of severe anxiety and intrusive thoughts. So, this was too strenuous of a demand for him.
All of that to is say that this has caused me to think, and rethink, and question, and read, and struggle through this whole issue of the Lord’s table and what is called “fencing” the table. The main place this is discussed in the New Testament is 1 Corinthians 11. I have read and re-read this passage, and all I can find is a verse that states, “A man (person) ought to examine himself before he eats the bread and drinks the cup.” Many churches want to take extra precautions in offering this meal to the very young, because they want to be sure that they understand what they are doing. I have grown to a different understanding of the purpose of this “feast” as I like to call it. It is a visual and sensual expression of the free grace that is lavished on anyone who will come. It prepares the way for children to understand how we come to God, not by being able to articulate everything just right, but by just coming, as a child.
As I pondered this further, I was struck by the first Lord’s Supper, you know the one Jesus himself served his disciples the night he was betrayed, just a few hours prior to that awful event. It is recorded in several places, but I looked again today at Luke 22. You know, he gave that meal to all twelve of his disciples. Even Judas. Yes, it could be argued rightly from Corinthians, that Judas ate and drank condemnation on himself. But, still Jesus offered him the meal. He did not “fence” the table. He also gave the meal to Peter, who later that same night, denied that he even knew him three times. Jesus knew he was about to do this, and he even told Peter as much, though Peter did not believe it was possible.
My point is that for weak, sincere, struggling believers, the kind Jesus loved to hang out with, the ones with broken hearts over their sins, this is good news. The Lord’s Table, like the gospel, is not for those who have it all together, but rather for those who need a real, living, present Saviour, in the messiness of their real lives, real sin struggles, and real doubts and failures, people who have sinned and are going to sin, people who fall and fail and mess up. People like that should never be turned away. And that is good news. Because that is me.