We need each other
When God created humankind, male and female he created them. And that was a beautiful part of his plan. Living in harmony together, sharing each other’s goals and plans, and together “ruling the earth and subduing it” was what he had in mind, and what they enjoyed in the garden.
Before I go any further, I need to admit that I am smack dab in the middle of re-thinking God’s design for men and women. No, I didn’t say I am questioning Scripture, but I am indeed questioning the traditional interpretation of what Scriptures say men and women’s roles should be, both in marriage and in the church. Remember, I’m smack dab in the middle. That means I don’t have all the answers, but I’m enjoying asking the questions. And I am finding myself more and more convinced that the patriarchal life view is contrary to God’s ideal design.
How could I make such a bold statement? Well, first of all, I guess I should define patriarchialism, as I am referring to it. It comes from two words, patre meaning father, and arche meaning rules. So, patriarchy is the thought that men are to rule inequivocably. (Men rule. Women drool.)
In its strictest form, patriarchialism says that the only job a woman is fit to do is to have children and be a helper to her husband. It teaches unquestioned submission to male authority as an endorsement for husbands and male leadership to control women. Among other things, it says that women are more emotional, and therefore unable to provide good leadership.
I have seen this teaching hurt women, marriages, and churches. Not only does it silence one of the marriage partners, but it also takes away the voice of half of the members of the body of Christ. And that cannot be a good thing.
In my own marriage I tried for years to fit into this traditional view of women and marriage. And it was detrimental to both me and my husband. Now we are both beginning to enjoy the benefits of mutual submission and partnership, both as parents, friends, and in our life endeavors.
The conservative church I’ve long been a part of holds dearly to the traditional interpretation of the role of men and women, to the exclusion of almost any other possible way of thinking. Women are not in any form of visible leadership, and they do not even hand out bulletins in the service, much less hold any office or teaching responsibility. Several women I know have attempted to be a part of this local church, and they have felt like they are a “half person.” I’m not making this stuff up. It is obvious to me, even in the way the male leadership talks, or doesn’t talk, to women, the way they listen, or do not listen to the thoughts and opinions of women. And I believe it is a distortion of God’s plan. He doesn’t want half of his children silenced and subordinated, living like a lesser person, due to the abuse of power.
The denomination plans to visit the issue of women serving as deaconesses at their national assembly this coming summer. For that I am grateful, but a little annoyed also. They plan to deliberate and discuss the acceptable role of women in the diaconate ministry in the church. Is is okay for women to be deacons, and if not, let’s make up some rules about what they can and cannot do to be a part of the diaconate ministry. First of all, like I said, I’m glad they’re talking about this, I really am. It has been needed for a long time.
But I’m still a little annoyed. Can a woman be a deacon? A deacon is someone who serves, right? I know it is an official office of the church now, but aren’t we all called to do that? And if we look closely at a many of the names mentioned in Paul’s letters to the New Testaments churches, what do we think these women were, if not servants, deaconesses? (See especially Phoebe in Romans 16, as well as many of the other women mentioned in that chapter, as well as the other letters.) And it is especially disturbing to more and more women in a society where a woman can potentially be president, but she may not be allowed to officially serve in her church.
Women who love and follow Jesus are naturally going to work in the roles of servants to those who need their individual gifts within and without the church. They do not need to be sanctioned by the church to do this. But, not allowing them to be sanctioned by the church sends a very loud message. And in our post-modern culture, this message is a huge deterrant to the advancement of the gospel. Now, keep in mind, that I am writing from deep in the Bible belt, in one of the southern states. We are probably 25 years behind the rest of the country culturally. In some ways, that can be nice, but in many others it is frustrating and irrelevant.
Two quotes from Dan Allender’s book Intimate Allies will illustrate what I feel is a more healthy approach. And though Dan is talking specifically about marriage, this will also relate to the church at large.
“A marriage is made up of two equal but profoundly different beings; each reflects the character of God in ways that give a unique picture of his character.”
And later in the same book: “As males and females we are significantly and intriguingly different. . .the differences invite fascinating, unending exploration. The problem with most attempts to define gender is that they do away with mystery to achieve a kind of precision that just is not possible. When we draw up lists to define the female ‘role’ and the male ‘role’, we create a breach in the mystery of the relationship of gender. The results are stifling and artificial. Ultimately we must succumb to the mystery of gender by not defining it too closely and precisely.”
I think it is obvious that this is just what we have done, defining gender and gender roles too closely and precisely. And it has not been a good thing. It has been an outworking of the curse, where God told Eve “he will rule over you.” Let’s not overlook that this is part of the curse. And we are called to be a vehicle for God’s redemptive work, the work of reversing the curse, rather than endorsing the curse by using a scriptural basis for doing so. This serves our own goals and devices. It certainly does not serve the purposes of the gospel. We really do need each other, males and females, for the messy and wonderful work of redemption, to be seen both in our marriages and in the church at large.
